29 Marzo 2024, 00:27:10 *
Bienvenido(a), Visitante. Por favor, ingresa o regístrate.

Ingresar con nombre de usuario, contraseña y duración de la sesión
Noticias: Foro RKKA
 
   Inicio   Ayuda Ingresar Registrarse  
Páginas: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]   Ir Abajo
  Imprimir  
Autor Tema: ¿Qué mejorarias del ejército ruso?  (Leído 10263 veces)
xammar
Colaborador portal RKKA
Mayor
*

Karma: 242
Mensajes: 574


« Respuesta #105 : 08 Abril 2017, 21:20:07 »

A base de varias lecturas y revisiones sobre los 'cuarteles generales' de subunidades (de Batallon hacia abajo) del ejercito sovietico/ruso, me llamaba la atencion que, en comparacion con sus homologos occidentales, sus estructuras de mando eran (y siguen siendo en la actualidad) notablemente mas pequeñas.
Superando todos los topicos al respecto, las unica lectura mas o menos honesta que he encontrado al respecto es en varios articulos del especialista Lester Grau, en especial en el siguiente extracto.

Citar
'' The science of command involves the commander picking the best option for accomplishing the mission and adjusting variables as needed. This process is assisted by rigid tactics and predictability that allow such practices as utilizing tables that estimate the percentage of an enemy unit that will be destroyed with a given amount of time from a specified unit (artillery firing tables, etc.). In terms of tactics, from a U.S. military decision-making process (MDMP) perspective, Russian military commanders have limited options for developing plans to accomplish given tasks.

Commanders pick from the “menu” of known tactics. Although this would irk a U.S. commander, Russian commanders are comfortable with this system because, although tactics are simple, albeit in aggregate, when multiple simple tactics are combined to accomplish a given task, a given maneuver could appear complex. Since these maneuvers are not developed “on-the-fly” and are instead a collection of simple tasks, the planning process is much less involved than for an equivalent maneuver by a U.S. unit.At the tactical level, this system allows these units to have miniscule staffs in comparison to Western units and do not require extensive operations orders to plan their missions. All that is typically required in a Russian operation order is a map signed by the commander, with a few notes jotted in the margins. Tactics are simple and rigid, but since they are universal, when used in aggregate they can provide great operational flexibility.''

-- The russian way of war (2016)

Asi que por lo que entiendo, el emplear 'staff minusculos' se debe, reduciendolo mucho, a que utilizan un menu de tacticas predeterminadas y tablas de calculos, en el que el resultado da la opcion a ejecutar, lo que repercute en un proceso mucho mas agil y comodo para los mandos.

Hacen referencia a los siguientes manuales:

V.N. Zaritski and L.A. Kharkevich, General Tactics [Общая Тактика], Tambov: Tambov Government Technical
University, 2007.
Field Manual: Preparation and Conduct of Combined Arms Warfare [Боевой Устав: По Подготовке и Ведению
Общевойскового Боя], Moscow: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 2005.



Un saludo
En línea
xammar
Colaborador portal RKKA
Mayor
*

Karma: 242
Mensajes: 574


« Respuesta #106 : 13 Abril 2017, 18:15:44 »

Sigo investigando este tema y me he encontrado con esto:

Para ver el contenido hay que estar registrado. Registrar o Entrar
Una reseña del libro de 1986, ''Soviet Airland Battle Tactics'' de William P. Baxter (Teniente Coronel del Us Army)

Citar
Thereafter the book contains a host of relevant detail as subsequent chapters deal with the Command and Staff, Offensive Operations, Defensive operations, Supporting Operations and logistics,  I have read fairly widely on the Soviet Armed forces and I found that this text adds significant insight into their way of doing business from a detailed description of how communications was managed in different phases of war to a description of the approach by which soviet officers were taught to appreciate military problems.  This includes namogrames that enabled soviet staff officers to rapidly consider complex problems for which western Staff officers lacked the tools to consider the problem in sufficient detail at speed.

Citar
Like Lt Col Glanz, Lt Col Baxter highlights the inappropriateness of the standard western view of a Soviet military driven by simplistic solution templates to standard problems and hypothesises that if the cold war had gone hot we may well have been in for a nasty shock if thats what we were expecting. This book compliments Lt Col Glantz's text on tactical manoeuvre providing the context that enables the reader to better understand the discourse on the forward detachment.  In comparison to the freely available texts in the FM 100 series this is eminently more readable, digestible and informative.

Y aqui un 'namograma' de las distancias de fuego de artilleria.

Para ver el contenido hay que estar registrado. Registrar o Entrar

Viene a comentar la vision profundamente erronea que tenian desde Occidente y la OTAN sobre el sistema de mando sovietico y que, en caso de conflicto, los enormes problemas a los que se hubiera enfrentado por infravalorar al PdV.

Un saludo
En línea
Páginas: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]   Ir Arriba
  Imprimir  
 
Ir a:  

VVS RKKA Topsites List
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines XHTML 1.0 válido! CSS válido!